Spec reviews now end in decisions
The review agenda is simple and it works. Our meetings are shorter and actually resolve things.
Browse
Structure clear specs with problems, goals, non goals, stories, acceptance criteria and edge cases, then run reviews that lead to decisions
Created by Daniel Adeyemi
Product specs have a reputation problem. Engineers complain they are either too vague to build from or so long nobody reads them. Product managers complain that they spend days writing documents that are ignored. A good spec is neither: it is a short, clear tool for shared understanding that saves the team time.
This course takes you through every part of a modern product requirements document, using a real style example: adding team permissions to a project management tool.
You get three templates: a one page spec for small features, a full PRD for larger projects and a review checklist. Each section of the course fills in part of the permissions spec, so by the end you have a complete example to compare with your own work.
This course is for product managers who already know the basics of the role and want to communicate better with engineering and design. Engineers and designers who write specs or technical proposals will also find it useful. We also look at using AI writing assistants to draft and critique specs, with an honest view of where they help and where they mislead.
Product manager teaching the fundamentals of shipping the right thing, one decision at a time
I have worked as a product manager on B2B and consumer software, mostly in teams of five to fifteen engineers. My day is spent talking to customers, deciding what not to build, writing specs and keeping engineering, design and the business pointed at the same problem.
I teach the fundamentals that new product managers rarely get taught directly: framing problems, writing clear specs, prioritising with evidence, running a roadmap that survives contact with reality, and measuring whether a release worked.
My courses use one running example product, so the frameworks always land on something concrete. I share my own templates and the mistakes that taught me why they look the way they do.
The review agenda is simple and it works. Our meetings are shorter and actually resolve things.
My specs got half as long and engineers ask far fewer clarifying questions. The non goals section alone changed our reviews.
Our tech lead asked what changed after my first spec using this structure. Edge cases and open questions made the difference.
Working through one real style feature made every section concrete. The permission matrix lesson was excellent.
I liked the honest take on AI drafting. Useful, but you still have to know what good looks like.
Strong content overall, but I would have liked more examples from different product types beyond permissions.
I am an engineer who writes proposals. The acceptance criteria and non functional sections were directly applicable.