Treats the system as a product
This is the course I wish I had before starting our system. The audit and first release lessons saved us from building forty components nobody used.
Browse
Plan, design, build and run a design system as a product, from the first interface audit to contribution, versioning and adoption
Created by Ana Sousa
Many design systems start with enthusiasm and a component library, then slowly lose relevance as product teams work around them. The systems that last are run like products: they have users, a roadmap, a clear scope, documentation people trust and a process for change. This course covers the whole life of a design system, with equal weight on craft and on how the system is run.
Each section uses the same case: a mid sized company with three product teams, two front end frameworks in use and a history of inconsistent interfaces. You will make the decisions a design system lead faces, with templates for audits, component specs, contribution guidelines and adoption reports.
This is an advanced course. You should already be comfortable with components in Figma and have some understanding of front end development. You do not need to write production code yourself, but you will read code examples in React and TypeScript and discuss trade offs with engineers in their language.
Design systems lead teaching tokens, components and governance that scale across teams
I have led design system work for product teams where several squads ship to the same interface. My job sits between design and front end engineering: defining tokens, designing and building components, writing documentation and setting up the process that keeps the system alive after launch.
I teach design systems as a product with users, not as a style guide. That means audits, roadmaps, contribution models and versioning, along with the hands on parts like Figma variables, token pipelines, Storybook and accessible component APIs.
My courses suit designers who want to understand the code side and developers who want to understand the design side. I explain the trade offs honestly, including when a team does not need a full system yet.
This is the course I wish I had before starting our system. The audit and first release lessons saved us from building forty components nobody used.
I appreciated the warning against made up time savings. The adoption metrics section helped me report progress credibly.
The composition versus configuration lesson changed how we designed our modal and menu components.
Watching a new designer use our docs, as suggested, revealed so many gaps. Our docs are far better now.
The contribution model template is now in our wiki. I wanted a little more on multi framework support.
The case study made the trade offs concrete. Reading the React examples was fine even as a designer.
Very good on planning and process. If you want deep coding details for components, you will need another course alongside it.
Component spec and acceptance criteria templates are practical and easy to adapt.